The first week of a course, automated: access, orientation, paperwork and the first real piece of work, all tracked per student.
Bring your stack to a call and we will scope it against how your business actually runs.
Book a callA student pays, and then goes quiet for three weeks. The provider treats enrollment as the finish line, sends a welcome email with a login and a handbook attached, and waits for the start date. What actually happens in that gap is that the decision cools. The student has not logged in, has not met anyone, has not done anything, and has nothing invested beyond the payment. By the time week one arrives, a predictable share of a paid cohort has not shown up, and the ones who do show up arrive unprepared because nobody made them do anything first.
The first week then compounds the problem. Orientation is a single live session that a third of the cohort misses. Access to the learning platform is granted manually by somebody who is also teaching. Paperwork - the learning agreement, the accessibility declaration, the emergency contact, the photo consent - is chased by email at random intervals until somebody gives up. Nobody knows which students have logged in and which have not, so the first person to notice a disengaged student is the tutor marking an empty first assignment in week three. At that point the intervention is a rescue, not a nudge.
This is where completion rates and refund requests are decided, and it is almost entirely mechanical. Every signal you need is observable: did they log in, did they complete the orientation module, did they return the paperwork, did they submit the first small task, did they turn up to the first live session. A build that watches those five signals per student, chases the specific missing one, and escalates to a human only when the automation has genuinely failed, turns the first week from a hope into a process.
One pipeline, Student Onboarding, holding every enrolled student from payment to the end of week one. Each card carries the cohort so the whole intake can be read as a column of progress.
Trigger: tag enrolled applied, or the enrollment pipeline card reaches an Enrolled stage.
Trigger: tag welcome-sent applied.
Trigger: tag welcome-sent applied.
Trigger: tag access-confirmed applied, or 5 days before Start Date, whichever is first.
Trigger: 7 days before Start Date, for every card not in a closed stage.
Trigger: 2 days before Start Date, cohort-wide to tag cohort-{{code}}.
Trigger: scheduled daily during the week before and the week of Start Date, plus on every Onboarding Score change.
Trigger: 7 days after Start Date.
The gap between payment and start stops being dead time. The student does something within hours of enrolling - logs in, signs the agreement, watches a two-minute welcome from the person who will actually teach them. That early action is what makes the start date feel like a continuation rather than a fresh decision.
Disengagement is caught in days, not weeks. A student who has not logged in by 48 hours is chased specifically for that, and is in front of a human by 96 hours. The tutor stops discovering problems at the first assignment deadline.
Paperwork completes itself. One consolidated form, chased on the specific missing item, with the sensitive follow-up routed to the right team rather than the general inbox. Staff stop spending week one as administrators.
Week one is the same for everyone. Live orientation, the recording and the module are three routes to the same outcome, all recorded identically, so a student who could not make Tuesday evening is not permanently a step behind.
The tutor opens day one informed. Preferred names, goals, declared support needs flagged (not detailed), and who is already behind. That changes the quality of the first hour of teaching.
Every build on this page is something we configure, test and hand over with the SOPs your team needs to run it.
Book a call