Back to the build library
Legal
Standard

Estate Planning Review Program

A multi-year review cadence that brings estate planning clients back before their documents go stale, with life-event triggers in between.

Industry
Legal
Build effort
Standard
Typical time to launch
2–4 weeks
On this page
The problemWhat gets builtHow it runsAutomations in detailWhat changesBefore you start
Want this built for you?

Bring your stack to a call and we will scope it against how your business actually runs.

Book a call
01

The problem

An estate plan is the one legal product that is designed to sit in a drawer for decades and then work perfectly on the single worst day of a family's life. Everything about how it is sold works against that. The client signs, takes the binder home, pays the bill, and the firm's relationship with them effectively ends. Meanwhile the plan ages against a world that does not stop moving: children are born, marriages end, the named executor dies or moves abroad, a house is sold, a business is started, a retirement account changes custodian, a beneficiary designation is never updated, and the tax and statutory landscape shifts underneath all of it.

By the time anyone looks at the documents again, the family is in crisis and the plan names a guardian who is no longer in the picture, a trustee who is no longer willing, or an asset that was sold years ago. The firm is then doing remedial work under emotional pressure, often for less money than the review would have cost, and frequently in circumstances where the client's family blames the firm for a plan that was perfectly good when it was drafted. Nobody told them it needed looking at.

Commercially, this is the clearest unforced error in small-firm practice. Every estate planning client is a known, qualified, already-trusting relationship that has been allowed to go cold. The review work is high-margin and genuinely valuable. The referral potential from a family whose plan worked is enormous. And the usual version of a review program - a reminder in a case management system that somebody is supposed to action, or an annual newsletter - does not survive contact with a busy year. What survives is a cadence that runs on its own over a multi-year horizon, that watches for the life events that make a plan stale early, and that presents the review as a scheduled piece of maintenance rather than a sales approach.

02

What gets built

Pipeline and stages

One pipeline, Plan Review Program. Unlike most pipelines this one is a loop, not a funnel: a client who completes a review goes back to the resting stage with a new review date, and does so for twenty years.

  • Plan Executed - In Program - documents signed, review clock running. The resting stage, where most clients live most of the time.
  • Review Window Open - the scheduled review date has arrived and outreach has begun.
  • Review Booked - an appointment is in the calendar.
  • Questionnaire Returned - the client has told the firm what changed, before the meeting.
  • Review Completed - No Changes - attorney confirmed the plan still does what the client wants. A real and valuable outcome.
  • Amendment In Progress - changes are being drafted.
  • Amendment Executed - new or amended documents signed; the clock resets.
  • Life Event Flagged - something happened that makes an early review necessary, outside the scheduled cycle.
  • Unresponsive - Long Cycle - no engagement across a full review window; moves to a slower, lighter cadence rather than being dropped.
  • Deceased or Incapacity Notified - handled entirely by humans. Listed so the system knows to stop, not to act.

Calendars

  • Plan Review Meeting - 45-minute slots with the responsible attorney, in person or by video. The core appointment the whole build exists to fill.
  • Quick Plan Check Call - 20-minute slots for clients whose questionnaire shows nothing material has changed, so a no-change review does not consume a full appointment.
  • Signing Appointment - 30-minute slots with witness and notary resources attached, for executing amendments.
  • Annual Client Seminar - group slots, if the firm runs education events. A review nudge attached to an invitation converts differently from a review nudge on its own.

Custom fields

  • Plan Executed Date and Last Review Completed Date - the two anchors everything else is calculated from.
  • Next Scheduled Review Date, Review Cycle Years, Reviews Completed Count.
  • Plan Complexity Tier - picklist: Simple Will, Will With Trust, Revocable Trust Plan, Irrevocable or Tax-Driven, Business Succession Included. Drives Review Cycle Years: a simple will might be a five-year cycle, a tax-driven plan a two-year one.
  • Documents In Plan - a multi-select of what the client actually holds: will, revocable trust, pour-over will, financial power of attorney, healthcare directive, guardianship nomination, deed, beneficiary designation summary, business agreement. Review outreach that names the client's own documents reads completely differently from generic copy.
  • Named Fiduciaries - a text field listing roles and names: executor, successor trustee, guardian, agent under power of attorney, healthcare agent. The single most common reason a plan goes stale is that one of these people is no longer suitable, available or alive.
  • Minor Children Youngest Birth Year - drives the guardianship-relevance window and an automatic review when the youngest reaches the age of majority.
  • Known Life Changes Pending - free text from the last review: a house sale planned, a business being sold, a child marrying.
  • Jurisdiction Of Residence - a move across state lines is one of the strongest early-review triggers there is.
  • Referral Source and Financial Advisor Contact - estate plans are frequently reviewed alongside an advisor, and a program that includes the advisor gets better engagement.
  • Preferred Channel, Language, Review Outreach Count, Last Engagement Date.
  • Original Attorney and Current Reviewing Attorney - these diverge over a twenty-year program and the copy has to handle it gracefully.

Tags

  • review-program-active, review-program-opted-out, review-program-closed.
  • review-window-open, review-booked, review-overdue.
  • life-event-flagged, minor-children, out-of-state-move, fiduciary-change-needed.
  • advisor-linked - a financial advisor or accountant is part of the relationship.
  • long-cycle - unresponsive, moved to the light-touch annual cadence.
  • do-not-contact-sensitive - bereavement, illness or family dispute; suspends all automated outreach.
  • sms-opt-out, review-request-eligible, seminar-attendee.

Forms

  • Plan Review Questionnaire - the most important asset in the build. Not a form asking whether they would like a review, but one asking what changed, in plain terms: marriages, divorces, births, deaths, moves, property bought or sold, business interests, retirement account changes, anybody named in the plan who should no longer be, and whether their wishes about any of it have changed. Returned before the meeting, it turns a 90-minute discovery conversation into a 45-minute decision conversation.
  • Life Event Notification Form - a permanent link in every message and on the firm's site: "something has changed in my family." Client-initiated, and the highest-value inbound the program produces.
  • Fiduciary Confirmation Form - a short standalone check on whether the named executor, trustee, guardian and agents are still right. Cheap to send, and the single highest-yield question in the whole program.
  • Review Outcome Form - internal. The attorney records: no changes needed, minor amendment, substantial restatement, or new plan required, plus the next cycle length.
  • Program Preferences Form - channel, language, whether to include the financial advisor, and the option to move to the light cadence instead of opting out entirely.

BO's role and guardrails

Estate planning is where the temptation to let an AI answer substantive questions is strongest, because the questions sound simple and are not. The guardrails have to be tight.

  • BO may: explain that the plan is due for its scheduled review and what the review covers in process terms, name which documents the client holds from Documents In Plan, send and chase the questionnaire, book and reschedule appointments, confirm what to bring, record a life event, and route everything else.
  • BO may not: say whether a plan needs changing; interpret any document; explain what a will, trust, power of attorney or directive does in the client's situation; comment on tax, probate, Medicaid or any consequence of any arrangement; advise on who should be named as a fiduciary; say whether a life event affects the plan; or confirm that a plan is still valid or still adequate. Every one of those is legal advice.
  • Standard deflection, and it should be used often: "That is exactly the kind of thing [Attorney Name] should look at with you rather than something I can answer - it depends on your documents and your situation. Shall I book you in?"
  • Never state or imply that any plan is up to date, compliant, valid, or sufficient. The whole point of a review is that only a lawyer can form that view, and a reassuring automated message that turns out to be wrong is worse than no message at all.
  • Every message carries the firm's administrative footer: administrative communication, not legal advice, no attorney-client relationship created or continued by the message itself. Whether the firm's relationship with a past client is ongoing or concluded between matters is a question for the firm's own counsel, and the engagement and closing letters should say so clearly.
  • Confidentiality: subject lines read "Your scheduled plan review with [Firm Name]". No SMS body or subject line names a beneficiary, a fiduciary, an asset, a family circumstance or a health matter. Estate planning correspondence is read by spouses, adult children and carers, and the plan's contents are frequently things the client has not shared with the people in their house.

Numbers and channels

  • Email as the primary channel. This is a long-horizon program and email addresses outlive phone numbers; keep postal addresses current for the same reason.
  • SMS for appointment logistics and short questionnaire reminders only, never for the substance of the review.
  • Printed letter on firm letterhead for the milestone reviews and for any client over a certain age or tagged for the paper path. For this audience a letter often outperforms everything else, and it reaches people whose email has lapsed.
  • Voice: outbound calls from a paralegal at the later steps of the outreach sequence, and inbound routing to the estate planning team.
  • A client-facing review page explaining what a review covers and why plans go stale, so the outreach can link rather than explain.
  • Annual data hygiene: an address, phone and email confirmation pass, because a twenty-year program dies of bounced email long before it dies of disinterest.
03

How it runs, step by step

One couple, one revocable trust plan, over about eight years. The time horizon is the point: nothing in this build pays off inside a quarter.

  1. The plan is executed. At the signing appointment the paralegal records Plan Executed Date, Plan Complexity Tier, Documents In Plan, Named Fiduciaries, Minor Children Youngest Birth Year, Jurisdiction Of Residence and the Financial Advisor Contact if there is one. A deal is created at Plan Executed - In Program, review-program-active is applied, and Review Cycle Years is set from the tier.
  2. The program is explained at the moment of greatest goodwill. The client is told, in the closing letter and in person, that their plan will go stale and that the firm will contact them on a cycle to look at it. Clients who hear this at signing are not surprised four years later, and the outreach lands as service rather than solicitation. Next Scheduled Review Date is written and shown to them.
  3. The dormant years. A short annual touch goes out on the anniversary - not a review request, just a brief note with the life-event link and a reminder of where the documents are stored. Low cost, keeps the address live, and keeps the firm's name attached to the plan.
  4. The data hygiene pass. Once a year the system verifies the email, postal address and phone number. A bounce, a hard failure or an undelivered letter raises an internal task to find the client by another route. This unglamorous step is what keeps the program alive over a decade.
  5. Year two: a life event arrives early. The client uses the Life Event Notification Form to say their named successor trustee has moved abroad. The deal moves to Life Event Flagged, fiduciary-change-needed is applied, and an attorney task is created within one business day. BO does not tell them whether it matters - it schedules the conversation with someone who can say.
  6. Early review completed. The attorney meets them, a minor amendment is drafted and executed. Last Review Completed Date is stamped, Reviews Completed Count increments, Named Fiduciaries is updated, and Next Scheduled Review Date is recalculated from the new date. The clock reset is the whole mechanism; without it the program double-contacts people who just came in.
  7. Year five: the scheduled window opens. Next Scheduled Review Date arrives. The deal moves to Review Window Open, review-window-open is applied, and the outreach sequence begins with an email naming their specific documents and the year they were signed.
  8. Outreach widens. If nothing comes back, the sequence escalates channel rather than volume: email, then the Fiduciary Confirmation Form on its own as a single easy question, then a printed letter, then a call from a paralegal. The one-question fiduciary check frequently succeeds where a review invitation fails, because it is answerable in ten seconds and it makes the risk concrete.
  9. The questionnaire comes back. They report a house sold, a grandchild born and a move to a neighbouring state. The deal moves to Questionnaire Returned; out-of-state-move is applied, which flags the review as substantive rather than routine and routes it to an attorney admitted in the relevant jurisdiction.
  10. The appointment happens. Because the questionnaire arrived first, the meeting is about decisions, not discovery. The attorney records the outcome on the Review Outcome Form: substantial restatement required, next cycle three years.
  11. Amendment runs as its own piece of work. The deal moves to Amendment In Progress. Drafting, review, and a Signing Appointment with witnesses and notary. This is a billable matter and should be scoped and engaged as one.
  12. Execution and reset. Documents signed, the deal moves to Amendment Executed, Documents In Plan and Named Fiduciaries are updated, Last Review Completed Date is stamped, and the deal returns to Plan Executed - In Program with a new Next Scheduled Review Date. The loop closes.
  13. A no-change review is still a win. Where the questionnaire shows nothing material, the client gets the Quick Plan Check Call instead of the full meeting. The attorney confirms the plan still reflects their wishes, the outcome is recorded as Review Completed - No Changes, and the client gets written confirmation of what was reviewed and on what date. That record protects the firm as much as it reassures the client.
  14. Some clients never respond. After a full window of outreach with no engagement, the deal moves to Unresponsive - Long Cycle and long-cycle is applied: one letter a year, nothing else, forever. Dropping them entirely is the wrong answer - these are the files where a plan is most likely to be badly out of date when it is finally needed.
  15. The worst case, handled by people. Notification of a death or incapacity moves the deal to Deceased or Incapacity Notified, applies do-not-contact-sensitive, and cancels every pending automated message on that contact and any linked spouse immediately. An automated review invitation arriving after a bereavement is the one failure in this build that is genuinely unforgivable, so build this stop first and test it hardest.
04

Automations in detail

Eight workflows. Two guards sit in front of every single one and must be built first: review-program-active must be present, and do-not-contact-sensitive must be absent. The second guard is the one that matters most here - an automated review invitation landing after a bereavement is the failure this build must never commit. Quiet hours and sms-opt-out apply throughout.

1. Program Enrollment at Execution

Trigger: plan documents recorded as executed.

  • Action 1: write Plan Executed Date, Plan Complexity Tier, Documents In Plan, Named Fiduciaries, Jurisdiction Of Residence, Minor Children Youngest Birth Year. Set Review Cycle Years from the tier table and calculate Next Scheduled Review Date.
  • Action 2: apply review-program-active, plus minor-children if a youngest birth year is present and advisor-linked if an advisor is recorded. Create the deal at Plan Executed - In Program.
  • Action 3, within 1 business day: the enrollment email. "Hi [First Name], your documents are signed and we have them on file. One thing worth saying now, while it is fresh: estate plans go out of date. People move, families change, the people you have named may not be the right people in ten years' time. So we will get in touch around [Next Scheduled Review Date] to look at it with you, and sooner if you tell us something has changed. Anything at all changes in the meantime, use this: [Life Event Link]. Here is what a review covers: [Review Page Link]."
  • Wait 7 days. Send the Program Preferences Form so the client sets channel and language and decides whether the advisor is included.

Exit: enrollment complete; the deal rests until a scheduled or event trigger fires.

2. Dormant-Year Anniversary Touch

Trigger: annually on the Plan Executed Date anniversary, where Next Scheduled Review Date is more than 9 months away.

  • Action 1: short email, no ask. "Hi [First Name], a quick annual note from [Firm Name]. Your plan is on file with us and your next scheduled review is around [Next Scheduled Review Date]. Nothing is needed from you today. If anything has changed - a move, a marriage, a birth, a death, property bought or sold, or any of the people named in your documents - tell us here and we will bring the review forward: [Life Event Link]."
  • Branch - minor-children and the youngest child turns 18 within the next 12 months: add one line flagging that the guardianship provisions are worth looking at, and bring Next Scheduled Review Date forward to within 6 months. The line says the provisions are worth looking at - never what they will or will not do.
  • Branch - advisor-linked and the client authorized advisor contact: copy the advisor on the anniversary note. Advisors drive a meaningful share of review bookings because they see the asset changes first.
  • Action 2: hand to workflow 8 for the data hygiene check.

Exit: sent, or suppressed because a review window is near.

3. Scheduled Review Window Outreach

Trigger: Next Scheduled Review Date is today. Conditions: guards pass, no review-booked, not long-cycle.

  • Action 1: move to Review Window Open, apply review-window-open, reset Review Outreach Count to 0.
  • Touch 1, day 0, email. Subject "Your scheduled plan review with [Firm Name]". Body: "Hi [First Name], your plan was signed in [year] and it is due for its scheduled review. You currently hold: [Documents In Plan]. A review is a conversation with [Current Reviewing Attorney] about whether those documents still do what you want them to do - we are not assuming anything needs changing, and plenty of reviews conclude that nothing does. Start by telling us what has changed since we last spoke: [Questionnaire Link]. Or go straight to booking: [Review Meeting Link]."
  • Wait 7 days. Touch 2, SMS plus email, the one-question version: "Hi [First Name], [Firm Name] here. One quick question about your plan - are the people you named as executor, trustee and guardian still the right people? Two minutes: [Fiduciary Form Link]." This single question outperforms the full invitation, because it is concrete and answerable.
  • Wait 10 days. Touch 3, email from the reviewing attorney, signed personally, explaining in general terms what tends to change over the years - moves, marriages, deaths, property, the people named - without saying anything about this client's own plan.
  • Wait 14 days. Touch 4, printed letter on letterhead with a paper questionnaire and a reply envelope. For this audience the letter frequently works where four emails did not.
  • Wait 14 days. Touch 5, task for the paralegal to telephone. A real call from a person named in the letter, offering to book, nothing more.
  • Wait 21 days. No engagement across any touch: apply review-overdue, hand to workflow 7.
  • Count and cap: increment Review Outreach Count on every touch. Five touches per window, then stop. A program that nags its own past clients loses the goodwill the whole thing depends on.

Exit: questionnaire returned, appointment booked, life event reported, or five touches exhausted.

4. Questionnaire Return and Triage

Trigger: Plan Review Questionnaire submitted.

  • Action 1: move to Questionnaire Returned, cancel the remaining outreach touches, notify the Current Reviewing Attorney with the responses attached.
  • Branch A - nothing material reported: offer the Quick Plan Check Call. "Thanks [First Name]. From what you have told us this looks straightforward, so a 20-minute call with [Attorney Name] should cover it rather than a full appointment: [Quick Check Link]." Note the wording - what the client told us looks straightforward. It does not say the plan is fine.
  • Branch B - material change reported (marriage, divorce, death, birth, move, property, business, fiduciary change): offer the full Plan Review Meeting and apply the relevant flags. An out-of-state move applies out-of-state-move and routes to an attorney admitted in that jurisdiction. A fiduciary change applies fiduciary-change-needed.
  • Branch C - a death in the family reported: apply do-not-contact-sensitive, stop all automation on this contact and any linked spouse, and create an immediate task for the attorney to make a personal call. No automated message of any kind goes out on this branch, including an acknowledgement of the form.
  • Action last: stamp Last Engagement Date.

Exit: appointment booked or attorney takes over.

5. Appointment Lifecycle

Trigger: Plan Review Meeting or Quick Plan Check booked.

  • Immediately: move to Review Booked, apply review-booked, cancel all outreach. Confirmation email with the time, the format, and a short list of what to bring: the document binder if they still have it, recent property or account paperwork, and any questions. Plus the questionnaire link if it has not been returned.
  • 7 days before, if the questionnaire is still outstanding: "Hi [First Name], looking forward to [date]. The meeting is much more useful if we have your questionnaire first: [Link]. Ten minutes well spent."
  • 2 days before: reminder with location or video link.
  • Morning of: SMS reminder.
  • No-show: same-day email and a next-day call task. Two rebooking attempts, then return the deal to Review Window Open with Review Outreach Count preserved so the cap still applies.
  • After the meeting: task for the attorney to complete the Review Outcome Form within 2 business days. Hand to workflow 6.

Exit: outcome recorded.

6. Outcome, Amendment and Clock Reset

Trigger: Review Outcome Form submitted.

  • Branch - no changes needed: move to Review Completed - No Changes. Send the attorney-approved confirmation: "Hi [First Name], confirming that [Attorney Name] reviewed your plan with you on [date] and, based on what you told us, no changes were needed at this time. Your next scheduled review will be around [new Next Scheduled Review Date]." Stamp Last Review Completed Date, increment Reviews Completed Count, recalculate the next date, return the deal to Plan Executed - In Program, remove review-window-open and review-overdue. That written record is worth having on both sides.
  • Branch - amendment or restatement required: move to Amendment In Progress. This is new billable work: create the engagement and scoping task, and treat the drafting as a matter of its own. No fee figure is ever quoted by an automation - the attorney or administrator handles that conversation.
  • During drafting: a short progress note to the client every 14 days while the deal sits in Amendment In Progress, so the amendment does not become its own silent gap.
  • On execution: move to Amendment Executed, update Documents In Plan and Named Fiduciaries, stamp Last Review Completed Date, recalculate Next Scheduled Review Date from the new Review Cycle Years, then return to Plan Executed - In Program. Send the storage-and-location note: where the originals are, who holds copies, and what to tell the named fiduciaries about where to look.
  • Wait 14 days after execution: if review-request-eligible, one review request about the service experience only - never about the plan, the outcome or the family's circumstances. One request, no follow-up.

Exit: clock reset, deal resting.

7. Life Event Interrupt and Long Cycle

Trigger A: Life Event Notification Form submitted, or a life event reported by phone and logged.

  • Action 1: move to Life Event Flagged, apply life-event-flagged, write the detail to Known Life Changes Pending, cancel any dormant-year or outreach step pending.
  • Action 2, within 1 business day: task for the Current Reviewing Attorney. The attorney - not the system - decides whether this needs an early review, a quick call, or nothing at this stage.
  • Action 3, acknowledgement to the client, carefully worded: "Thanks for letting us know, [First Name]. [Attorney Name] will look at what you have told us and come back to you within two business days about whether your plan needs anything. If it is easier to talk it through now, book here: [Review Meeting Link]." Nothing in that message says whether the event affects the plan, because only the attorney can say.
  • Branch - event is a death, serious illness or family dispute: apply do-not-contact-sensitive, suppress every automated message, route to the attorney for a personal call. Human only.
  • Branch - out-of-state move: apply out-of-state-move, update Jurisdiction Of Residence, bring Next Scheduled Review Date forward to within 60 days, and route to an attorney admitted in the new jurisdiction. If the firm is not admitted there, the task is to have a conversation about a referral - something no automation should attempt.

Trigger B: review-overdue applied and five touches exhausted.

  • Move to Unresponsive - Long Cycle, apply long-cycle, remove review-window-open, set Next Scheduled Review Date out by 12 months.
  • One letter a year thereafter, on letterhead, saying the plan is on file, when it was last reviewed, and how to get in touch. Nothing else, indefinitely. These are the clients whose plans are most likely to be badly out of date, so the firm keeps the door open rather than deleting the relationship.
  • Any engagement at all - a reply, a form, a call - removes long-cycle and restores the normal cycle.

Exit: attorney closes the task, or engagement restores the normal cadence.

8. Data Hygiene and Program Health

Trigger: annually per contact, plus on any hard bounce, failed SMS or returned letter.

  • Action 1: contact-details confirmation email. "Hi [First Name], housekeeping only - we hold your plan on file and want to be sure we can reach you about it in future. Confirm or correct your details here: [Link]. Nothing else needed."
  • Branch - hard bounce or returned letter: apply a stale-contact flag, suppress that channel, and create a task for the paralegal to trace the client through the other channels on file, including the advisor if advisor-linked.
  • Branch - all channels failed: internal task for the attorney. A client the firm cannot reach, holding documents the firm drafted, is a situation for a lawyer to think about rather than a record to archive.
  • Action 2, monthly internal digest to the estate planning team: reviews due in the next 90 days, reviews overdue, life events awaiting an attorney decision, amendments in progress past 30 days, unreachable clients, and the long-cycle population. The digest is what stops a twenty-year program from quietly decaying.
  • Action 3, quarterly: flag any contact whose Last Review Completed Date is more than double their Review Cycle Years for partner review, regardless of stage. Nothing should be able to hide in this program.

Exit: runs indefinitely while the program is active.

05

What changes

The firm stops losing contact with its own estate planning clients. Every executed plan carries a date when it will next be looked at, and that date is enforced by a system rather than by somebody's memory. The back catalog - clients from five, ten, fifteen years ago - becomes a reachable population again instead of a filing cabinet, and the firm finds out early which of those relationships have gone cold, rather than discovering it when a family calls in crisis.

Review work becomes a predictable, schedulable line of business. Reviews due in the next 90 days appear on a digest, which means the practice can be staffed rather than reacted to. Because the questionnaire arrives before the meeting, each appointment is shorter and more productive, and the no-change outcome stops being a wasted hour: it becomes a 20-minute call and a written confirmation the client values and the file records.

Risk falls in a way that is hard to quantify and easy to recognize. The firm has a documented record that it told each client their plan would age, contacted them on a schedule, asked specifically about the people they had named, and recorded what happened each time. The most common catastrophic estate planning failures - a dead or unwilling fiduciary, a guardianship clause naming someone irrelevant, a plan drafted for a state the client left years ago - are exactly the ones this cadence surfaces while they are still cheap to fix.

Metrics to watch

  • Review completion rate per window: of the clients whose review window opened this quarter, what share completed a review of either kind. The headline number.
  • Touch number at which engagement happens. This tells you which outreach step is actually working. Expect the one-question fiduciary check and the printed letter to outperform the full invitation.
  • Questionnaire return rate, and the share of booked meetings with the questionnaire already in. The second number drives appointment efficiency directly.
  • Amendment rate - share of completed reviews that produce billable amendment work - and the mix of minor amendment, restatement and new plan. This is the revenue model of the program.
  • Fiduciary change rate. Track it separately. It is the clearest evidence that the program is catching real risk, and it is the number to show a sceptical partner.
  • Life events self-reported per hundred active clients per year. A rising number means clients understand that telling the firm is part of the deal.
  • Reachability: share of the active program with a verified email, phone and postal address. Over a multi-year horizon this quietly becomes the constraint on everything else.
  • Long-cycle population size and the rate at which clients fall into it. Growth here means the outreach is not working for a particular cohort, usually the oldest files.
  • Referrals and new matters attributable to review contacts. Estate planning clients who are in regular contact refer family, and the program is often where probate and business succession work originates.
  • Guardrail audit: a monthly sample of BO conversations checked for any answer that strayed into substance, and a hard check that no automated message ever went to a contact tagged do-not-contact-sensitive. Treat a single breach of the second as a stop-the-line incident.
06

Before you start

Build this first, before any outreach

  • The bereavement and sensitivity stop. The do-not-contact-sensitive guard, the linked-spouse suppression and the kill switch on every pending step must exist, be tested, and be verified before a single review email is capable of sending. An automated invitation to review an estate plan arriving at a household three weeks after a death is the one failure that destroys the relationship and the firm's reputation in the same message. Test it with real pending sequences, not in theory.
  • A way to be told someone has died. The Life Event form, a named phone number, and a documented internal process for the person who takes that call. The system cannot suppress what nobody records.

Platform and data

  • Decide where the plan record lives. The document management or practice management system holds the documents; the platform holds the review cadence, the contact data and the engagement history. Documents In Plan and Named Fiduciaries in the platform are a working summary, not the file.
  • Backfill is the real project. The value is in the existing client base, and that data is usually in closed files, old matter records and a spreadsheet somebody keeps. Scope the backfill honestly and run it in cohorts - newest files first, where contact data is most likely to be live - rather than importing twenty years at once and triggering several hundred review windows in the same week. Stagger the review dates on import.
  • Build the Plan Complexity Tier to Review Cycle Years table with the estate planning partner. It is a professional judgment about how often each kind of plan should be looked at, and it should be documented as the firm's own policy.
  • Write the questionnaire with the attorney who runs the reviews. It is the most important asset in the build, and a generic one will not surface what matters. Keep it plain, short, and about facts rather than conclusions.
  • Confirm the firm has capacity for the reviews the program will generate before switching it on. A cadence that successfully books more appointments than the firm can staff will damage the relationships it was built to repair.

Integrations

  • Document or practice management system, for the executed-plan trigger and the document inventory.
  • Calendar sync for every reviewing attorney, plus witness and notary resources on the signing calendar.
  • Two-way email on a monitored firm domain with SPF, DKIM and DMARC configured. This matters more here than anywhere else, because deliverability over a ten-year horizon is the program.
  • Print and mail fulfillment, whether an internal process or a service, since the letter path is load-bearing for the oldest cohort.
  • E-signature for amendments where the firm's jurisdiction permits it for the documents in question - which, for wills and some other instruments, it frequently does not. Check before you build the path.
  • Email verification or list hygiene tooling for the annual pass.

Numbers and messaging compliance

  • Provision a number for client care and complete A2P 10DLC brand and campaign registration. Register honestly: these are notifications and customer care to existing clients of the firm.
  • Be careful about the marketing line. Outreach to a past client about a scheduled review of work the firm performed is ordinarily client communication, but if the program drifts into promoting other services it becomes advertising, and advertising to past clients is regulated. Keep the review sequences strictly about the plan.
  • Honor STOP, UNSUBSCRIBE, CANCEL, QUIT and variants immediately and permanently via sms-opt-out, with opt-out language in the first message of each sequence. Offer the light long-cycle option as an alternative to a full opt-out, because a client who wants less contact rarely wants none.
  • Quiet hours 8am to 8pm in the client's time zone, no automated weekend or holiday sends. Be deliberate about dates: an estate planning message landing on a major holiday or an anniversary of a death reads very differently from the same message on a Tuesday.
  • Record consent to ongoing contact about the plan at engagement and at each review, with timestamp and source.

Confidentiality, privilege and professional obligations

  • Estate planning content is unusually sensitive within the household. Who inherits what, who was left out, who holds the healthcare agency, whether there is a trust at all - clients routinely have not told their spouse, their children, or the person they named. Nothing identifying any of that goes in a subject line, an SMS body or a preview-visible first line. Assume someone else will see the message.
  • Joint clients need a decision, in writing, made in advance. Spouses planning together, later divorcing or separating, create conflicts that automated joint messaging will walk straight into. Agree with counsel how joint contacts are represented in the system, what happens on separation, and whether either spouse's instruction can change the other's contact arrangements.
  • Privilege and retention. Questionnaire responses are client communications about their affairs and may be privileged. Decide where they are stored, who can see them, how long they are kept, and whether they belong in the matter file rather than only in the platform. Review the vendor's data processing terms, hosting location, retention and subprocessor list with counsel.
  • No legal advice, no attorney-client relationship. BO's scope here is narrow and the temptation is wide. Nothing automated may interpret a document, state whether a plan is still valid or adequate, explain the effect of a life event, or comment on tax, probate or eligibility for anything. Test the guardrails adversarially with the questions clients genuinely ask - "does my will still work if we moved", "do I need a trust", "can my daughter be executor", "is this still valid" - and review live conversations monthly.
  • Whether the relationship is ongoing or concluded between matters has consequences for conflicts, duties and how this outreach should be characterized. Settle it with the firm's own counsel and make the engagement and closing letters say so explicitly, then write the program's copy to match.
  • Multi-jurisdiction care. A client who has moved may need advice the firm cannot give. Build the referral conversation as a human task, never as an automated reassurance or an automated referral.
  • Capacity. Over a multi-year program some clients will lose capacity. Automated messaging to a client who can no longer understand it, or correspondence reaching a family member who was never the client, raises real duties. Have a documented process, and make the sensitivity stop easy for staff to apply.
  • Review requests and testimonials about estate planning work are regulated in most jurisdictions and are easy to get wrong when the subject is a family's private arrangements. Service experience only, once, at a sensible moment, with wording counsel approved.

None of the above is legal advice. Confirm the specifics - the review cycle policy, joint client handling, consent and retention of questionnaire responses, the characterization of past-client outreach, advertising and solicitation rules, testimonial rules, capacity, and supervision of automated client communication - with the firm's own compliance counsel and against the applicable rules of professional conduct in every jurisdiction where the firm practises. The estate planning partner should read and approve every template, and the sensitivity guards should be signed off before launch.

Scoping

The size of the back catalog, the state of the historic contact data, the complexity tier table, the print path and the practice management integration all move the build. To scope it for a specific firm, book a call at bookings.appbo.io.

Field notes

Build it with us.

Every build on this page is something we configure, test and hand over with the SOPs your team needs to run it.

Book a call